2005 Rolls-Royce Phantom vs. 1965 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 2005 Rolls-Royce Phantom is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 6,748 cc (12 cylinders), 2005 Rolls-Royce Phantom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Rolls-Royce Phantom (454 HP @ 5350 RPM) has 291 more horse power than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. (163 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Rolls-Royce Phantom should accelerate faster than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 1530 kg more than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Rolls-Royce Phantom | 1965 Sunbeam Tiger | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Sunbeam |
| Model | Phantom | Tiger |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1965 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
| Engine Size | 6748 cc | 4261 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 454 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5350 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2670 kg | 1140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5840 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3830 mm | 2190 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 27 L |
