2005 Rover 25 vs. 2010 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2010 Nissan Pixo is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Rover 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Rover 25 would be higher. At 1,396 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Rover 25 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Rover 25 (102 HP) has 34 more horse power than 2010 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Rover 25 should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan Pixo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Rover 25 | 2010 Nissan Pixo | |
Make | Rover | Nissan |
Model | 25 | Pixo |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1396 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 68 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 155 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 10.2 seconds | 13.5 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2360 mm |