2005 Rover 75 vs. 1964 Seat 1500
To start off, 2005 Rover 75 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Rover 75 (129 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1964 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1964 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Rover 75 weights approximately 400 kg more than 1964 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Seat 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Seat 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Rover 75 | 1964 Seat 1500 | |
Make | Rover | Seat |
Model | 75 | 1500 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 1481 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2660 mm |