2005 Rover 75 vs. 2000 Volvo S40
To start off, 2005 Rover 75 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Volvo S40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Volvo S40 would be higher. At 1,796 cc, 2005 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Rover 75 (148 HP) has 40 more horse power than 2000 Volvo S40. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 2000 Volvo S40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Rover 75 weights approximately 85 kg more than 2000 Volvo S40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Rover 75 (215 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Volvo S40. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2005 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Volvo S40.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Rover 75 | 2000 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Rover | Volvo |
Model | 75 | S40 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1587 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 215 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Top Speed | 205 km/hour | 220 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.6 seconds | 8.5 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1415 kg | 1330 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 60 L |