2005 Rover 75 vs. 2004 Volvo S40
To start off, 2005 Rover 75 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Volvo S40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Volvo S40 would be higher. At 2,521 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo S40 (218 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 2005 Rover 75. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 2005 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo S40 weights approximately 36 kg more than 2005 Rover 75. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volvo S40 (320 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Rover 75. (215 Nm). This means 2004 Volvo S40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Rover 75 | 2004 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Rover | Volvo |
Model | 75 | S40 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 2521 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 218 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 215 Nm | 320 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1415 kg | 1451 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.3 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 60 L |