2005 Saab 03-Sep vs. 2013 Volvo X670

To start off, 2013 Volvo X670 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Saab 03-Sep. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Saab 03-Sep would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo X670 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo X670 (237 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2005 Saab 03-Sep. (210 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo X670 should accelerate faster than 2005 Saab 03-Sep. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo X670 weights approximately 293 kg more than 2005 Saab 03-Sep. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo X670 (320 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Saab 03-Sep. (300 Nm). This means 2013 Volvo X670 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Saab 03-Sep.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Saab 03-Sep 2013 Volvo X670
Make Saab Volvo
Model 03-Sep X670
Year Released 2005 2013
Body Type Convertible Crossover
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1981 cc 3200 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 6 valves
Horse Power 210 HP 237 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6400 RPM
Torque 300 Nm 320 Nm
Engine Bore Size 86 mm 84 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86 mm 96 mm
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1579 kg 1872 kg
Vehicle Length 4640 mm 4838 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1870 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1604 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2815 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 8.4 L/100km 8.2 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 11.2 L/100km 11.6 L/100km