2005 Saab 9000 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Epica
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Saab 9000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Saab 9000 would be higher. At 2,490 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Epica (154 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2005 Saab 9000. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Epica should accelerate faster than 2005 Saab 9000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Saab 9000 weights approximately 15 kg more than 2010 Chevrolet Epica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Saab 9000 (350 Nm) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Chevrolet Epica. (237 Nm). This means 2005 Saab 9000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Chevrolet Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Saab 9000 | 2010 Chevrolet Epica | |
Make | Saab | Chevrolet |
Model | 9000 | Epica |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2290 cc | 2490 cc |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 237 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1575 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2710 mm |