2005 Saab 9000 vs. 2010 Ford F-150
To start off, 2010 Ford F-150 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Saab 9000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Saab 9000 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford F-150 (310 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 195 more horse power than 2005 Saab 9000. (115 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 2005 Saab 9000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford F-150 weights approximately 964 kg more than 2005 Saab 9000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Ford F-150 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Ford F-150. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Saab 9000, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford F-150 (494 Nm) has 214 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Saab 9000. (280 Nm). This means 2010 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Saab 9000.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Saab 9000 | 2010 Ford F-150 | |
Make | Saab | Ford |
Model | 9000 | F-150 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2288 cc | 5400 cc |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 310 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 494 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 2549 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 136 L |