2005 Saab 9000 vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Saab 9000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Saab 9000 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (237 HP) has 122 more horse power than 2005 Saab 9000. (115 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2005 Saab 9000.
Because 2010 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Saab 9000, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XF (500 Nm) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Saab 9000. (280 Nm). This means 2010 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Saab 9000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Saab 9000 | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Saab | Jaguar |
| Model | 9000 | XF |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2288 cc | 3000 cc |
| Horse Power | 115 HP | 237 HP |
| Torque | 280 Nm | 500 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2908 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 70 L |
