2005 Saab 9000 vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Saab 9000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Saab 9000 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS (318 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 203 more horse power than 2005 Saab 9000. (115 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2005 Saab 9000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 193 kg more than 2005 Saab 9000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Saab 9000, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Cadillac CTS (372 Nm) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Saab 9000. (280 Nm). This means 2012 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Saab 9000.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Saab 9000 | 2012 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Saab | Cadillac |
Model | 9000 | CTS |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2288 cc | 3600 cc |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 318 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 372 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1778 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 68 L |