2005 Saturn L vs. 2009 Jeep Cherokee

To start off, 2009 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Saturn L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Saturn L would be higher. At 2,999 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Saturn L is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Saturn L (182 HP) has 7 more horse power than 2009 Jeep Cherokee. (175 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Saturn L should accelerate faster than 2009 Jeep Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 587 kg more than 2005 Saturn L.

Because 2009 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Saturn L. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Cherokee (460 Nm) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Saturn L. (258 Nm). This means 2009 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Saturn L.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Saturn L 2009 Jeep Cherokee
Make Saturn Jeep
Model L Cherokee
Year Released 2005 2009
Body Type Sedan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2999 cc 2768 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 182 HP 175 HP
Torque 258 Nm 460 Nm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 17.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Front 4WD
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1468 kg 2055 kg
Vehicle Length 4840 mm 4500 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1850 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1800 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2700 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 10.2 L/100km 8.4 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 59 L 70 L