2005 Saturn L vs. 2010 Opel Combo
To start off, 2010 Opel Combo is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Saturn L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Saturn L would be higher. At 2,999 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Saturn L is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Saturn L (182 HP) has 93 more horse power than 2010 Opel Combo. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Saturn L should accelerate faster than 2010 Opel Combo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Saturn L (258 Nm) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Opel Combo. (126 Nm). This means 2005 Saturn L will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Opel Combo.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Saturn L | 2010 Opel Combo | |
Make | Saturn | Opel |
Model | L | Combo |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2999 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 258 Nm | 126 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 52 L |