2005 Saturn L vs. 2011 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2011 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Saturn L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Saturn L would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP) has 91 more horse power than 2005 Saturn L. (182 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2005 Saturn L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 496 kg more than 2005 Saturn L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Saturn L. (258 Nm). This means 2011 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Saturn L.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Saturn L | 2011 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Saturn | Mazda |
| Model | L | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2999 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 273 HP |
| Torque | 258 Nm | 366 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1468 kg | 1964 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 5085 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1935 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1727 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2875 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 8.4 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 76 L |
