2005 Saturn Relay vs. 2011 Chrysler 200
To start off, 2011 Chrysler 200 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Saturn Relay. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Saturn Relay would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Saturn Relay is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Saturn Relay (201 HP) has 28 more horse power than 2011 Chrysler 200. (173 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Saturn Relay should accelerate faster than 2011 Chrysler 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Saturn Relay weights approximately 205 kg more than 2011 Chrysler 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Saturn Relay (298 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Chrysler 200. (225 Nm). This means 2005 Saturn Relay will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Chrysler 200.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Saturn Relay | 2011 Chrysler 200 | |
Make | Saturn | Chrysler |
Model | Relay | 200 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 173 HP |
Torque | 298 Nm | 225 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1938 kg | 1733 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4948 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3080 mm | 2766 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 64 L |