2005 Scion xA vs. 2010 Kia Cadenza

To start off, 2010 Kia Cadenza is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Scion xA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Scion xA would be higher. At 2,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Kia Cadenza is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Cadenza (200 HP) has 94 more horse power than 2005 Scion xA. (106 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cadenza should accelerate faster than 2005 Scion xA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Cadenza weights approximately 505 kg more than 2005 Scion xA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Kia Cadenza has automatic transmission and 2005 Scion xA has manual transmission. 2005 Scion xA will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Kia Cadenza will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Scion xA 2010 Kia Cadenza
Make Scion Kia
Model xA Cadenza
Year Released 2005 2010
Body Type Hatchback Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1495 cc 2700 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 106 HP 200 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1070 kg 1575 kg
Vehicle Length 3920 mm 4965 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1850 mm
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 1475 mm
Wheelbase Size 2380 mm 2845 mm