2005 Scion xB vs. 2010 Suzuki SX4
To start off, 2010 Suzuki SX4 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Scion xB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Scion xB would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Suzuki SX4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Suzuki SX4 (150 HP) has 42 more horse power than 2005 Scion xB. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Suzuki SX4 should accelerate faster than 2005 Scion xB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Suzuki SX4 weights approximately 149 kg more than 2005 Scion xB. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Suzuki SX4 (190 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Scion xB. (142 Nm). This means 2010 Suzuki SX4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Scion xB.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Scion xB | 2010 Suzuki SX4 | |
| Make | Scion | Suzuki |
| Model | xB | SX4 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1490 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 150 HP |
| Torque | 142 Nm | 190 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4491 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1544 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2499 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 6.9 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 7.6 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 50 L |
