2005 Seat Alhambra vs. 2010 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2010 Holden Commodore is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Seat Alhambra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Seat Alhambra would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Seat Alhambra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 39 more horse power than 2005 Seat Alhambra. (201 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2005 Seat Alhambra.
Because 2005 Seat Alhambra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Seat Alhambra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Seat Alhambra (265 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2005 Seat Alhambra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Seat Alhambra | 2010 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Seat | Holden |
Model | Alhambra | Commodore |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 265 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |