2005 Seat Toledo vs. 1966 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2005 Seat Toledo is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Seat Toledo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Seat Toledo (99 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Seat Toledo should accelerate faster than 1966 Suzuki Fronte.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Seat Toledo (148 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (81 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 Seat Toledo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Seat Toledo | 1966 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Seat | Suzuki |
Model | Toledo | Fronte |
Year Released | 2005 | 1966 |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 785 cc |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 148 Nm | 81 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2250 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 66 L |