2005 Skoda Superb vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2005 Skoda Superb is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,494 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Skoda Superb is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Skoda Superb (161 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Skoda Superb should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Skoda Superb weights approximately 75 kg more than 1965 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Skoda Superb (350 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Skoda Superb will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Skoda Superb | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Skoda | Triumph |
Model | Superb | 2000 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2494 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.3 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 64 L |