2005 Smart Coupe vs. 2008 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2008 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Smart Coupe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Smart Coupe would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan X-Trail (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 2005 Smart Coupe. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 2005 Smart Coupe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 981 kg more than 2005 Smart Coupe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan X-Trail (320 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 225 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Smart Coupe. (95 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2008 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Smart Coupe.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Smart Coupe | 2008 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Smart | Nissan |
| Model | Coupe | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Size | 698 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 95 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 15.6:1 |
| Top Speed | 135 km/hour | 181 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 15.5 seconds | 12.8 seconds |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1711 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 1820 mm | 2640 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.7 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 65 L |
