2005 Smart ForTwo vs. 2010 Citroen C1
To start off, 2010 Citroen C1 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Smart ForTwo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Smart ForTwo would be higher. At 998 cc (3 cylinders), 2010 Citroen C1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Citroen C1 (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2005 Smart ForTwo. (40 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C1 should accelerate faster than 2005 Smart ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Citroen C1 weights approximately 60 kg more than 2005 Smart ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Smart ForTwo (100 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Citroen C1. (93 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2005 Smart ForTwo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Citroen C1. 2010 Citroen C1 has automatic transmission and 2005 Smart ForTwo has manual transmission. 2005 Smart ForTwo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Citroen C1 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Smart ForTwo | 2010 Citroen C1 | |
Make | Smart | Citroen |
Model | ForTwo | C1 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 797 cc | 998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 40 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 100 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65.5 mm | 71 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 135 km/hour | 157 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 19.8 seconds | 13.7 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 805 kg | 865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 3440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1820 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 3.4 L/100km | 4.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 22 L | 35 L |