2005 Spyker C8 vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2005 Spyker C8 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Subaru R2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Subaru R2 would be higher. At 4,172 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Spyker C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Spyker C8 weights approximately 350 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2.
Because 2005 Spyker C8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Spyker C8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Spyker C8 | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
Make | Spyker | Subaru |
Model | C8 | R2 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4172 cc | 658 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 44 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 30 L |