2005 Spyker C8 vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Spyker C8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Spyker C8 would be higher. At 3,999 cc, 2005 Spyker C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 406 kg more than 2005 Spyker C8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Spyker C8 | 2010 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Spyker | Cadillac |
| Model | C8 | CTS |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3999 cc | 3000 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 270 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1756 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4867 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1504 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 68 L |
