2005 SsangYong Korando vs. 2003 Volvo S40
To start off, 2005 SsangYong Korando is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Volvo S40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Volvo S40 would be higher. At 2,874 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 SsangYong Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 SsangYong Korando (217 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2003 Volvo S40. (168 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Korando should accelerate faster than 2003 Volvo S40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 SsangYong Korando weights approximately 285 kg more than 2003 Volvo S40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 SsangYong Korando (305 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Volvo S40. (230 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2005 SsangYong Korando will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Volvo S40.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 SsangYong Korando | 2003 Volvo S40 | |
| Make | SsangYong | Volvo |
| Model | Korando | S40 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2874 cc | 2435 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 230 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 22.0:1 | 10.3:1 |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1785 kg | 1500 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 62 L |
