2005 SsangYong Musso vs. 2004 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2005 SsangYong Musso is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 2,874 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 SsangYong Musso is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 SsangYong Musso (118 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 2004 Volkswagen Polo. (60 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Musso should accelerate faster than 2004 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 2005 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Volkswagen Polo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 SsangYong Musso (245 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Volkswagen Polo. (125 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2005 SsangYong Musso will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 SsangYong Musso | 2004 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | SsangYong | Volkswagen |
| Model | Musso | Polo |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2874 cc | 1894 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4100 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 125 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 1600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92.4 mm | 95.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 22.0:1 | 19.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Top Speed | 156 km/hour | 160 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 16.4 seconds | 17 seconds |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 3900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1470 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.8 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 45 L |
