2005 SsangYong Rexton vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2005 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,874 cc, 2005 SsangYong Rexton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 SsangYong Rexton (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Rexton should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 730 kg more than 1966 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 SsangYong Rexton (305 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 SsangYong Rexton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 SsangYong Rexton | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | SsangYong | Triumph |
| Model | Rexton | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2874 cc | 1998 cc |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 91 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1900 kg | 1170 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 64 L |
