2005 SsangYong Rexton vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 2005 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 SsangYong Rexton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 SsangYong Rexton (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Rexton should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 1128 kg more than 1980 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 SsangYong Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Volvo 66. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 SsangYong Rexton has automatic transmission and 1980 Volvo 66 has manual transmission. 1980 Volvo 66 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 SsangYong Rexton will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 SsangYong Rexton | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
Make | SsangYong | Volvo |
Model | Rexton | 66 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3199 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 822 kg |