2005 SsangYong Rexton vs. 1984 Volvo 740
To start off, 2005 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Volvo 740. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Volvo 740 would be higher. At 2,874 cc, 2005 SsangYong Rexton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 SsangYong Rexton (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1984 Volvo 740. (81 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Rexton should accelerate faster than 1984 Volvo 740. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 560 kg more than 1984 Volvo 740. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 SsangYong Rexton (305 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Volvo 740. (143 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2005 SsangYong Rexton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Volvo 740.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 SsangYong Rexton | 1984 Volvo 740 | |
| Make | SsangYong | Volvo |
| Model | Rexton | 740 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2874 cc | 2316 cc |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 143 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1900 kg | 1340 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2780 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 80 L |
