2005 SsangYong Rexton vs. 2001 BMW Z3
To start off, 2005 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW Z3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW Z3 would be higher. At 2,874 cc, 2005 SsangYong Rexton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 SsangYong Rexton (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2001 BMW Z3. (185 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Rexton should accelerate faster than 2001 BMW Z3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 545 kg more than 2001 BMW Z3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 SsangYong Rexton (305 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW Z3. (237 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 SsangYong Rexton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW Z3. 2001 BMW Z3 has automatic transmission and 2005 SsangYong Rexton has manual transmission. 2005 SsangYong Rexton will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 BMW Z3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 SsangYong Rexton | 2001 BMW Z3 | |
Make | SsangYong | BMW |
Model | Rexton | Z3 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2001 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2874 cc | 2488 cc |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1900 kg | 1355 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 51 L |