2005 SsangYong Rexton vs. 2001 Volvo SCC
To start off, 2005 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Volvo SCC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Volvo SCC would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 SsangYong Rexton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 SsangYong Rexton (217 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2001 Volvo SCC. (208 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Rexton should accelerate faster than 2001 Volvo SCC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 409 kg more than 2001 Volvo SCC. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 SsangYong Rexton (295 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Volvo SCC. (285 Nm). This means 2005 SsangYong Rexton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Volvo SCC. 2001 Volvo SCC has automatic transmission and 2005 SsangYong Rexton has manual transmission. 2005 SsangYong Rexton will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Volvo SCC will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 SsangYong Rexton | 2001 Volvo SCC | |
Make | SsangYong | Volvo |
Model | Rexton | SCC |
Year Released | 2005 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3199 cc | 2521 cc |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 295 Nm | 285 Nm |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1860 kg | 1451 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 73 L | 70 L |