2005 SsangYong Rexton vs. 2004 Audi S3
To start off, 2005 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi S3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi S3 would be higher. At 2,874 cc, 2005 SsangYong Rexton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi S3 (222 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2005 SsangYong Rexton. (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi S3 should accelerate faster than 2005 SsangYong Rexton. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 477 kg more than 2004 Audi S3.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 SsangYong Rexton (305 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi S3. (280 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2005 SsangYong Rexton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi S3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 SsangYong Rexton | 2004 Audi S3 | |
| Make | SsangYong | Audi |
| Model | Rexton | S3 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2874 cc | 1779 cc |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 222 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5900 RPM |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 280 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 2200 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1900 kg | 1423 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2530 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 62 L |
