2005 SsangYong Rexton vs. 2004 Volvo V50
To start off, 2005 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Volvo V50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Volvo V50 would be higher. At 2,874 cc, 2005 SsangYong Rexton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 SsangYong Rexton (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 2004 Volvo V50. (133 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Rexton should accelerate faster than 2004 Volvo V50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 445 kg more than 2004 Volvo V50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volvo V50 (340 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 SsangYong Rexton. (305 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2004 Volvo V50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 SsangYong Rexton.
Compare all specifications:
2005 SsangYong Rexton | 2004 Volvo V50 | |
Make | SsangYong | Volvo |
Model | Rexton | V50 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2874 cc | 1986 cc |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 133 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 340 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1900 kg | 1455 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 58 L |