2005 SsangYong Rexton vs. 2009 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2009 Volvo XC90 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 SsangYong Rexton. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 SsangYong Rexton would be higher. At 3,192 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo XC90 (235 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2005 SsangYong Rexton. (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 2005 SsangYong Rexton. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 302 kg more than 2009 Volvo XC90.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo XC90 (320 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 SsangYong Rexton. (305 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2009 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 SsangYong Rexton. 2009 Volvo XC90 has automatic transmission and 2005 SsangYong Rexton has manual transmission. 2005 SsangYong Rexton will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Volvo XC90 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 SsangYong Rexton | 2009 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | SsangYong | Volvo |
| Model | Rexton | XC90 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2874 cc | 3192 cc |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 235 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1900 kg | 1598 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2870 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 80 L |
