2005 SsangYong Rexton vs. 2012 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2012 Suzuki Equator is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 SsangYong Rexton. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 SsangYong Rexton would be higher. At 3,954 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Suzuki Equator (262 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2005 SsangYong Rexton. (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Suzuki Equator should accelerate faster than 2005 SsangYong Rexton. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 835 kg more than 2012 Suzuki Equator.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Suzuki Equator (381 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 SsangYong Rexton. (305 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2012 Suzuki Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 SsangYong Rexton. 2012 Suzuki Equator has automatic transmission and 2005 SsangYong Rexton has manual transmission. 2005 SsangYong Rexton will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Suzuki Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 SsangYong Rexton | 2012 Suzuki Equator | |
| Make | SsangYong | Suzuki |
| Model | Rexton | Equator |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2874 cc | 3954 cc |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 262 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 381 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1900 kg | 1065 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3560 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 80 L |
