2005 SsangYong Rexton vs. 2013 BMW X5
To start off, 2013 BMW X5 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 SsangYong Rexton. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 SsangYong Rexton would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 BMW X5 (296 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 2005 SsangYong Rexton. (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 2005 SsangYong Rexton. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 BMW X5 weights approximately 350 kg more than 2005 SsangYong Rexton. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 BMW X5 (407 Nm @ 5800 RPM) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 SsangYong Rexton. (305 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2013 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 SsangYong Rexton. 2013 BMW X5 has automatic transmission and 2005 SsangYong Rexton has manual transmission. 2005 SsangYong Rexton will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 BMW X5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 SsangYong Rexton | 2013 BMW X5 | |
| Make | SsangYong | BMW |
| Model | Rexton | X5 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2874 cc | 2996 cc |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 296 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 407 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 8-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1900 kg | 2250 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2933 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 85 L |
