2005 SsangYong Rexton vs. 2013 Volkswagen Golf
To start off, 2013 Volkswagen Golf is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 SsangYong Rexton. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 SsangYong Rexton would be higher. At 2,874 cc, 2005 SsangYong Rexton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 SsangYong Rexton (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2013 Volkswagen Golf. (168 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Rexton should accelerate faster than 2013 Volkswagen Golf. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 524 kg more than 2013 Volkswagen Golf. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 SsangYong Rexton (305 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Volkswagen Golf. (240 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2005 SsangYong Rexton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Volkswagen Golf.
Compare all specifications:
2005 SsangYong Rexton | 2013 Volkswagen Golf | |
Make | SsangYong | Volkswagen |
Model | Rexton | Golf |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2874 cc | 2500 cc |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1900 kg | 1376 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2578 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 55 L |