2005 Subaru Outback vs. 2008 Volvo S60
To start off, 2008 Volvo S60 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Subaru Outback. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Subaru Outback would be higher. At 2,458 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Subaru Outback weights approximately 109 kg more than 2008 Volvo S60.
Because 2005 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Volvo S60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Subaru Outback (339 Nm) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Volvo S60. (240 Nm). This means 2005 Subaru Outback will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Volvo S60.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Subaru Outback | 2008 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Subaru | Volvo |
Model | Outback | S60 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2458 cc | 1983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 240 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 100 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.2:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1549 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.4 L/100km | 12.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 70 L |