2005 Suzuki Aerio vs. 2011 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Suzuki Aerio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Suzuki Aerio would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Matrix (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2005 Suzuki Aerio. (156 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 2005 Suzuki Aerio.
Because 2005 Suzuki Aerio is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Toyota Matrix. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Suzuki Aerio will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Toyota Matrix (219 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Suzuki Aerio. (204 Nm). This means 2011 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Suzuki Aerio. 2011 Toyota Matrix has automatic transmission and 2005 Suzuki Aerio has manual transmission. 2005 Suzuki Aerio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Toyota Matrix will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Suzuki Aerio | 2011 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Suzuki | Toyota |
Model | Aerio | Matrix |
Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2294 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 156 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 204 Nm | 219 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.4 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.8 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 50 L |