2005 Suzuki Grand Vitara vs. 2000 Volvo C70
To start off, 2005 Suzuki Grand Vitara is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Volvo C70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Volvo C70 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Suzuki Grand Vitara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Suzuki Grand Vitara (165 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2000 Volvo C70. (161 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Suzuki Grand Vitara should accelerate faster than 2000 Volvo C70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Suzuki Grand Vitara weights approximately 41 kg more than 2000 Volvo C70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Volvo C70 (230 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Suzuki Grand Vitara. (220 Nm). This means 2000 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Suzuki Grand Vitara.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Suzuki Grand Vitara | 2000 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Suzuki | Volvo |
Model | Grand Vitara | C70 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 230 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1445 kg | 1404 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 68 L |