2005 Suzuki Liana vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Suzuki Liana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Suzuki Liana would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 44 more horse power than 2005 Suzuki Liana. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2005 Suzuki Liana.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Suzuki Liana. (145 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Suzuki Liana.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Suzuki Liana | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | Suzuki | Holden |
Model | Liana | Epica |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.9 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |