2005 Suzuki Reno vs. 1963 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2005 Suzuki Reno is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Suzuki Reno is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Suzuki Reno (126 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Suzuki Reno should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Suzuki Reno weights approximately 742 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Suzuki Reno (171 Nm) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm). This means 2005 Suzuki Reno will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Suzuki Reno | 1963 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Suzuki | Suzuki |
| Model | Reno | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 358 cc |
| Horse Power | 126 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 171 Nm | 32 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1242 kg | 500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2060 mm |
