2005 Suzuki Reno vs. 1963 Triumph Herald
To start off, 2005 Suzuki Reno is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Suzuki Reno is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Suzuki Reno (126 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1963 Triumph Herald. (50 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Suzuki Reno should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Suzuki Reno weights approximately 421 kg more than 1963 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Triumph Herald is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Triumph Herald. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Suzuki Reno, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Suzuki Reno (178 Nm) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph Herald. (85 Nm). This means 2005 Suzuki Reno will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Suzuki Reno | 1963 Triumph Herald | |
| Make | Suzuki | Triumph |
| Model | Reno | Herald |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1147 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 126 HP | 50 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 178 Nm | 85 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 69.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1262 kg | 841 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2330 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 29 L |
