2005 Suzuki Reno vs. 1963 Wartburg 312
To start off, 2005 Suzuki Reno is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Wartburg 312. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Wartburg 312 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Suzuki Reno is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Suzuki Reno (126 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1963 Wartburg 312. (36 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Suzuki Reno should accelerate faster than 1963 Wartburg 312. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Suzuki Reno weights approximately 302 kg more than 1963 Wartburg 312. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Suzuki Reno (178 Nm) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Wartburg 312. (81 Nm). This means 2005 Suzuki Reno will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Wartburg 312.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Suzuki Reno | 1963 Wartburg 312 | |
Make | Suzuki | Wartburg |
Model | Reno | 312 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 126 HP | 36 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 81 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 6.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1262 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 43 L |