2005 Suzuki Reno vs. 1968 Vauxhall Viscount
To start off, 2005 Suzuki Reno is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Vauxhall Viscount. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Vauxhall Viscount would be higher. At 2,649 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Vauxhall Viscount is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Vauxhall Viscount weights approximately 58 kg more than 2005 Suzuki Reno.
Because 1968 Vauxhall Viscount is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Vauxhall Viscount. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Suzuki Reno, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Suzuki Reno | 1968 Vauxhall Viscount | |
| Make | Suzuki | Vauxhall |
| Model | Reno | Viscount |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2649 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 126 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1262 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2740 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 45 L |
