2005 Suzuki Reno vs. 1979 Suzuki LJ 50
To start off, 2005 Suzuki Reno is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Suzuki LJ 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Suzuki LJ 50 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Suzuki Reno is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Suzuki Reno (126 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1979 Suzuki LJ 50. (26 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Suzuki Reno should accelerate faster than 1979 Suzuki LJ 50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Suzuki Reno weights approximately 498 kg more than 1979 Suzuki LJ 50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1979 Suzuki LJ 50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Suzuki Reno. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Suzuki LJ 50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Suzuki Reno (171 Nm) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Suzuki LJ 50. (52 Nm). This means 2005 Suzuki Reno will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Suzuki LJ 50.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Suzuki Reno | 1979 Suzuki LJ 50 | |
Make | Suzuki | Suzuki |
Model | Reno | LJ 50 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1979 |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 539 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 126 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 171 Nm | 52 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1242 kg | 744 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 3280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 1940 mm |