2005 Suzuki Reno vs. 2003 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2005 Suzuki Reno is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Nissan X-Trail. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Nissan X-Trail would be higher. Both 2005 Suzuki Reno and 2003 Nissan X-Trail are equipped with a 1,998 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Nissan X-Trail (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2005 Suzuki Reno. (126 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 2005 Suzuki Reno. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 23 kg more than 2005 Suzuki Reno. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Nissan X-Trail (192 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Suzuki Reno. (178 Nm). This means 2003 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Suzuki Reno.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Suzuki Reno | 2003 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Suzuki | Nissan |
Model | Reno | X-Trail |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 126 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 192 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1262 kg | 1285 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 60 L |