2005 Suzuki Reno vs. 2005 Volkswagen Caravelle
To start off, both 2005 Suzuki Reno and 2005 Volkswagen Caravelle were released in the same year (2005). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 2,461 cc, 2005 Volkswagen Caravelle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Suzuki Reno (126 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2005 Volkswagen Caravelle. (104 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Suzuki Reno should accelerate faster than 2005 Volkswagen Caravelle. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volkswagen Caravelle weights approximately 643 kg more than 2005 Suzuki Reno.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volkswagen Caravelle (250 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Suzuki Reno. (171 Nm). This means 2005 Volkswagen Caravelle will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Suzuki Reno.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Suzuki Reno | 2005 Volkswagen Caravelle | |
Make | Suzuki | Volkswagen |
Model | Reno | Caravelle |
Year Released | 2005 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2461 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 126 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 171 Nm | 250 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 81.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 95.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 19.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 9 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1242 kg | 1885 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3330 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.4 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 80 L |