2005 Suzuki Reno vs. 2011 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2011 Ford C-Max is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Suzuki Reno. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Suzuki Reno would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Suzuki Reno is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Suzuki Reno (126 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2011 Ford C-Max. (105 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Suzuki Reno should accelerate faster than 2011 Ford C-Max. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford C-Max weights approximately 113 kg more than 2005 Suzuki Reno.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Suzuki Reno (178 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Ford C-Max. (150 Nm). This means 2005 Suzuki Reno will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Ford C-Max.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Suzuki Reno | 2011 Ford C-Max | |
Make | Suzuki | Ford |
Model | Reno | C-Max |
Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 126 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 150 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1262 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1828 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1626 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2648 mm |