2005 Suzuki Reno vs. 2013 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2013 Toyota Matrix is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Suzuki Reno. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Suzuki Reno would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Matrix (156 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2005 Suzuki Reno. (126 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 2005 Suzuki Reno. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 238 kg more than 2005 Suzuki Reno. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Matrix (220 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Suzuki Reno. (170 Nm). This means 2013 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Suzuki Reno.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Suzuki Reno | 2013 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Suzuki | Toyota |
Model | Reno | Matrix |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 126 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 220 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86.1 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 96 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1242 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4365 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.8 L/100km | 7.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.7 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 50 L |