2005 Suzuki XL7 vs. 2010 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac BLS is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Suzuki XL7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Suzuki XL7 would be higher. At 2,792 cc, 2010 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac BLS (247 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 2005 Suzuki XL7. (185 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 2005 Suzuki XL7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Suzuki XL7 weights approximately 75 kg more than 2010 Cadillac BLS.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac BLS (350 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Suzuki XL7. (250 Nm). This means 2010 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Suzuki XL7.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Suzuki XL7 | 2010 Cadillac BLS | |
| Make | Suzuki | Cadillac |
| Model | XL7 | BLS |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2737 cc | 2792 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 185 HP | 247 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 250 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1560 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.5 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 58 L |
